Ivankovich Multi-Jurisdiction
Litigation Record: 2018–2026

Court finds Steven Ivankovich and Atlas Holdings LLC jointly and severally liable. Ivankovich's defense — that Atlas Holdings "was not a signatory to the Operating Agreement" — rejected. Court treats both Ivankovich personally and his entity as a single economic enterprise. This is the first documented judicial rejection of Ivankovich's entity-as-shield defense that he reuses across all subsequent litigation.

Chinese investment group files suit against Steven Ivankovich, Anthony Ivankovich, and affiliated entities in Northern District of Illinois. Alleges fraud and breach of fiduciary duty on $10M+ investment. Case No. 1:20-cv-04985.

Steven Ivankovich faces proceedings in Delaware Chancery Court related to Chicago Spire development financing. Establishes patterns referenced in subsequent Florida proceedings.

Starboard Yacht Group receives SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loan (EIDL) funding of $1,900,000 under the CARES Act — personally guaranteed by Charles J. Stratmann. Combined with Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans and Employee Retention Credit (ERC) refunds exceeding $500,000, SYG deploys over $2.4 million in total government-backed capital. The funds enable SYG to invest in business expansion, hire additional staff, and acquire marine equipment during a COVID-suppressed industry when competitors were contracting. Per the Joe S. affidavit, this infusion of capital is referenced in subsequent proceedings as a factor in the parties' business relationship.

Starboard Yacht Group debuts the Pursuit 287 center console at FLIBS 2020, showcasing marine stabilization expertise and establishing SYG's presence as a premium vessel outfitter in the South Florida marine market. Coordinated by SYG marketing department with Travis Moore.

Jonathan Kappack is hired by Starboard Yacht Group as a "Seakeeper technical advisor" with direct access to proprietary installation methodology, client relationships, and vendor coordination protocols. This is Phase 1 of the documented Kappack pipeline: employment access precedes litigation extraction and competitive replacement.

Jeanette Ivankovich files for divorce from Steven in Cook County Circuit Court, Domestic Relations Division. Represented by Schiller DuCanto & Fleckl LLP (SDF) — Chicago's premier high-asset divorce firm. Steven represented by Jason M. Wandner / Allison Rub-Rodriguez. Cook County Judge Boyd presides. SDF's engagement signals a contentious, asset-intensive dissolution. Divorce proceedings will compel full financial disclosure of all Ivankovich entities — IMG Marine, CMR, Atlas Holdings, 12Five Capital, Consilient Holdings, Dubai operations. Case No. 2021D009220.

Jonathan Kappack files an employment lawsuit against Starboard Yacht Group while still possessing insider knowledge of SYG's proprietary Seakeeper installation methodology and client relationships. Attorney Chris Kleppin represents Kappack. This is Phase 2 of the documented Kappack pipeline: extracting value through litigation after gaining employment access. The lawsuit is filed approximately one year after Kappack's hiring and shortly after he acquired SYG's trade secret operational knowledge.

12Five Capital LLC (Ivankovich entity) files judgment/collection action against IMG Marine LLC (another Ivankovich entity). Shell-on-shell manufactured litigation: Ivankovich controls both plaintiff and defendant. Judgment acquired by Tom Price through Radiance Capital Receivables LLC. Price becomes "judgement holder / seller of the vessels holding judgement rights to all IMG assets." Jake Stratmann later coordinates with Price as recovery coordinator. 5 IMG vessels appraised by Vessel Value Survey (VVS) in Fort Pierce.

SYG conducts second demonstration of the Pursuit 287 at FLIBS 2021, deepening relationships with marine equipment manufacturers and demonstrating sustained commitment to vessel stabilization technology. Marketing team coordination with Renee, Matthew, Corla, and Rosario under Travis Moore.

The vessel at the center of the Seacoast foreclosure is appraised at $1,000,000 by Paul R. Anstey, Inc. This is the only appraisal in the record. The vessel will later be sold at U.S. Marshal sale for $160,000 — 16% of appraised value. The disparity between the appraisal and the sale price is a central evidence point for price suppression and fraud analysis.

Contessa Marine, LLC filed as Florida Limited Liability Company (Document L16000087982, EIN 81-2604020). Authorized Person: COOK, JOHN (MGR, The Woodlands, TX). This is the ORIGINAL entity — likely formed legitimately by or for Anthony Ivankovich. It existed for 5+ years before the SYG dispute. Status: ACTIVE (annual reports filed through 2025).

Contessa Marine, LLC (L16000087982) amends its Florida registration: principal/mailing address changed to 1441 Brickell Ave Suite 1400, Miami, FL 33131; registered agent changed to Robert Allen Law at same address. This amendment occurs ONE WEEK before Steven Ivankovich files a new entity with a confusingly similar name. The amendment may have been the first step in Steven's plan to take control of the CMR brand.

An Amended and Restated Operating Agreement for Contessa Marine is drafted, naming Anthony Ivankovich as the 100% "sole member" with Steven Ivankovich assigning his entire interest to him. CRITICAL CONTRADICTION: The agreement explicitly claims Contessa Marine is a "Delaware LLC", yet no such Delaware entity exists; the only active entity is Contessa Marine Research LLC, a Florida LLC (L21000423951). Furthermore, while Anthony is named sole member, Joe Seinitz (former GM) declares Anthony had no knowledge of any loans, vessels, or litigation. Anthony's signature page contains no verifiable signature, indicating a fraudulent setup to shield Steven's personal control.

ONE WEEK after the original CMR amendment, Steven Ivankovich files NEW entity "Contessa Marine Research LLC" (Document L21000423951, EIN 87-4333981). Authorized Person: IVANKOVICH, STEVEN. Principal Address: 1000 Brickell Ave Suite 715, Miami, FL 33131 — the same address later used on the Seacoast complaint. Registered Agent: COGENCY GLOBAL INC. This is the entity that engaged SYG, filed CMR v. SYG, and is defendant in Seacoast v. CMR. Anthony Ivankovich appears on NEITHER Sunbiz record. Status: INACTIVE as of 09/22/2022 — the entity existed only long enough to serve its litigation purpose.

Steven Ivankovich, through Contessa Marine Research LLC (CMR — the 2021 entity L21000423951), engages Starboard Yacht Group to resolve Cobia 330 DC performance issues — specifically the vessel was "not performing to its intended use" due to Seakeeper gyroscopic stabilizer defects. Ivankovich's own complaint later admits he directed the vessel to "Starboard Marine to resolve Seakeeper problems" (Saint Tony ¶37). SYG performs proprietary engineering and trade secret work under contract. Ivankovich exercises direct operational control including stop-work orders — then later claims the same corrective work SYG performed was "misappropriation."

PILLAR EVENT — ORIGIN OF SK35 PURCHASE: Steven Ivankovich issues written threats of multi-party litigation against Seakeeper Inc., Cobia Boats, and Marine Connection over a Cobia 32/33 SK2 gyro corrosion failure on M/V Octopussy, forwarded by the Seakeeper regional representative. Ivankovich writes: “I am going to have to take this into litigation…” (COBIA_IVANKOVICH_SEAKEEPER_INTEL_HANDOVER). Rather than face a three-front product-liability action, Seakeeper contacts Charles J. (Jake) Stratmann at SYG as the trusted regional expert and Owner’s Representative to broker a global resolution. Stratmann introduces Chase Russell ([email protected], East Florida Refit Sales Rep) to Ivankovich on May 13, 2022 (CMR-THREATS-000153) and mediates a deal that prevents ruinous litigation for all three manufacturers. This Owner’s Rep role is contemporaneously documented and known to Moore & Company — CMR’s later pleadings claiming SYG “deceived” Ivankovich into purchasing SK35 units are directly contradicted by this record showing Ivankovich initiated the dispute and agreed to the resolution. Source: RICO DB id=494, id=577.

The Cobia global resolution brokered by Stratmann and Chase Russell is struck: (1) Seakeeper replaces Ivankovich’s defective SK2 gyro on M/V Octopussy at no charge ($0) under warranty; (2) SYG purchases stock SK26 unit; (3) Ivankovich funds at cost plus shipping the purchase of three SK35 gyro stabilizer units through SYG for the Octopussy refit project. Ivankovich is an active, willing participant in this negotiation — he is not a passive victim of any pressure. His own reversal email on May 16 confirms his commercial appetite: “There are actually more units to discuss — the Heesen, a new unit for an Intrepid… several more for a new build” (CMR-THREATS-000153). CMR’s sworn counterclaim (DE 31 ¶¶91–92 / DE 197 ¶145) later falsely characterizes these units as “outdated models… no longer needed or of no use” — a knowing material misrepresentation to the court, directly contradicted by the contemporaneous purchase record. SYG pays Seakeeper $576,084.00 for the three SK35 units (Serials: 35-212-0428, 35-212-0432, 35-212-0433), shipped June 29, 2022. Source: RICO DB id=495, 496, 497, 578.

Seakeeper manufacturing and financial books confirm that SYG paid $576,084.00 for three SK35 units (Serial Numbers: 35-212-0428, 35-212-0432, 35-212-0433) shipped on June 29, 2022 as part of the Cobia SK2 warranty settlement mediated by Charles J. Stratmann with Chase Russell ([email protected]). Seakeeper later processes returns and credits for unit -0433 ($170,004.20) and unit -0432 ($192,068.00), totaling $362,072.20. Crucially, the court in CMR v. SYG excludes this credit from the judgment (DE 299 fn 3) and flags potential 1st-Degree Grand Theft regarding these funds. This primary-source document proves that CMR’s sworn pleadings (DE 31 ¶¶91-92 / DE 197 ¶ 145) claiming the parts were "outdated models... no longer needed or of no use" are knowing, material false statements made to perpetrate litigation fraud.

Starboard Yacht Group unveils the Everglades 350LX at FLIBS 2022, configured with integrated Humphree interceptors and Seakeeper gyro stabilization for ultimate-level vessel optimization and motion control. Demonstrates SYG's proprietary expertise in marine stabilization systems — the same technology domain at issue in CMR v. SYG. Marketing team: Renee, Matthew, Corla, Rosario; coordinated with Travis Moore.

Following repeated contempt in the Zhu Zhai matter, the 7th Circuit grants mandamus writ and orders $425,000 arrest bond against Steven Ivankovich. This is the first major judicial credibility finding establishing the pattern of willful non-compliance.

Saint Tony LLC (Ivankovich entity) files 6-count warranty suit over 2020 Cobia 330 DC. ¶37 states vessel "delivered to Starboard Marine to resolve Seakeeper problems" — the same work Ivankovich later claims was misappropriation in CMR v. SYG. Moore & Company PA serves as counsel for both this case and CMR.

PILLAR EVENT: Steven Ivankovich hosts a whole-day team meeting at TRIP (Tripp Hotel) with SYG principals present. He shares the plan to combine his capital resources with SYG’s expertise and businesses into a joint venture, with Moore & Company, P.A. — Michael T. Moore and Caycie Blake Flitman — framed as shared JV counsel. This formation day is the hinge for the later Florida inversion (same firm prosecutes CMR’s counterclaim / holds the $400K Octopussy substitute security) and sits upstream of the parallel Dubai KJM / KJI JVA (Mar 20, 2023). See dual-track visual: SYG vs CMR vs KJM comparison.

The 1988 Heesen 143-ft. motor yacht M/V Octopussy (Jamaica Registry No. JMP15060) arrives at SYG's Fort Lauderdale facility for an extensive refit. SYG recruits a global team to plan a first-of-its-kind hybrid-propulsion conversion with stabilization package, Voith linear jets, and hydrogen-generated hotel power. The project is documented publicly by SYG as "The Yacht That Couldn't Be Built."

CORRECTED RECORD: Seacoast National Bank originates a $2,015,400.00 business loan to Contessa Marine Research, LLC, secured by a foreign ship mortgage on M/Y Octopussy registered in Jamaica. Anthony Ivankovich unconditionally guarantees the debt. Public filings place the loan agreement date in August 2021. The loan predates M/V Octopussy's arrival at SYG and is the foundational debt that later drives Seacoast v. CMR (1:25-cv-25958-DPG). As of mid-November 2025, the outstanding principal is $1,549,773.47 plus interest and attorneys' fees. The vessel mortgage is the loan collateral — not the Preston Bradley Center.

The historic Preston Bradley Center (built 1925, home of Peoples Church of Chicago) is sold for $2 million. Public reports identify the buyers as Dr. Daniel Ivankovich and his wife Karla Ivankovich. A separate commercial-real-estate report lists the buyers as "real estate investor Steven Ivankovich and his brother Dr. Dan Ivankovich," with James Hodur and Ben Miotti of Coldwell Banker Commercial NRT representing the buyer and David Kimball/Jay Beadle of MB Real Estate representing seller Peoples Church of Chicago. The building is intended to become a nonprofit community hub housing OnePatient Global Health Initiative and the Chicago Blues Society. The purchase is a separate transaction from the Seacoast M/Y Octopussy loan and is not the collateral for that debt.

Seakeeper audit September 2023: SK26 in SYG inventory 12 months, paid for ($238K unit). Seakeeper ordered SYG to sell $1.4M in Seakeeper product before year end. This sales quota — imposed on a dealer with $238K of paid inventory — is a captive dealer control mechanism. SYG cannot recover its investment without Seakeeper's continued authorization, creating a financial trap.

Seakeeper rep objects to SYG advertisement featuring a super yacht photo: “Perception and first impressions are important and to an educated buyer the ad showed SYG as not being aligned with its product offering.” Seakeeper exercises direct editorial control over SYG's marketing content — confirming captive dealer status where the manufacturer controls not just inventory and sales quotas but also the dealer's public advertising.

COBIA PILLAR — ADMIRALTY ENFORCEMENT: After Ivankovich refuses to honor SYG’s maritime lien for necessaries ($576K+ Octopussy refit including the Cobia SK2 settlement), Starboard Yacht Group LLC files a Verified Complaint (Case 0:23-cv-61696-RNS, Judge Raag Singhal) against M/V Octopussy in rem and Contessa Marine Research LLC in personam. On September 6, 2023, the U.S. Marshal executes a Warrant of Arrest In Rem under Supplemental Admiralty Rule C and physically seizes M/V Octopussy. SYG is appointed Substitute Custodian for the vessel (DE 15, 23) — a court-ordered fiduciary role making SYG responsible for safekeeping while the vessel is in federal custody. This is the mechanism through which SYG’s lien rights are preserved as the action proceeds. The arrest was SYG’s enforcement action — the same docket later inverted to “CMR v. SYG” after Contessa counterclaimed. RICO DB id=207, id=253.

COBIA PILLAR — ASSET FLIGHT: Following the U.S. Marshal arrest, the parties stipulate to a $400,000 substitute security bond held in the IOTA trust account of Moore & Company P.A. (CMR’s own litigation counsel) to release M/V Octopussy from federal custody. The vessel is released and immediately launched. M/V Octopussy then departs U.S. jurisdiction and is sailed to Dubai, UAE — placing a multi-million dollar asset beyond the reach of U.S. enforcement judgments, admiralty liens, and federal writs. Ivankovich simultaneously pursues active commercial marine operations in Dubai, filing suit in the DIFC Court of First Instance against KJM Marine LLC et al. (2023–2024, heard Mar 17, 2024). The $400K bond is held throughout by the adversary’s own counsel. Stratmann’s trial opening (CMR Bench Trial Feb 23, 2026, pp.28–34) explicitly names “8 boats, Dubai, Lightspeed EVO” as the enterprise picture Ivankovich conceals from his testimony. The Dubai departure is a core RICO asset-concealment predicate: vessel built with SYG’s labor, arrested to enforce payment, bonded out through adversary counsel, then removed from U.S. jurisdiction before judgment is entered.

Steven Ivankovich files commercial marine claim in the Dubai International Financial Centre (DIFC) Court of First Instance against KJM Marine LLC et al. Case heard March 17, 2024. Ivankovich is the PLAINTIFF. KJM Marine LLC is a DIFC-registered marine entity. RICO significance: Ivankovich was pursuing commercial marine operations in Dubai simultaneously with his role as an adversely affected party in CMR v. SYG. Confirms international marine enterprise network spanning US, UAE, and Cayman Islands. The DIFC is an independent common-law jurisdiction — identical to a federal district court within the UAE. Adds 8th+ jurisdiction to the Ivankovich litigation map.

CMR (Ivankovich entity) files separate commercial claim against KJM Marine LLC in the DIFC Court of First Instance. Case assigned to Justice Michael Black. This creates a triangular litigation pattern: (1) Ivankovich v KJM Marine (CFI 068/2024), (2) CMR v KJM Marine (CFI 091/2024), (3) CMR v SYG (S.D. Fla. 0:23-cv-61696). The same Ivankovich-controlled entity suing both its Dubai JVA partner and its Florida marine contractor simultaneously — while claiming SYG's refit work was fraudulent. Hearing scheduled for June 17, 2026.

CORRECTED PROCEDURAL HISTORY: After SYG arrested M/V Octopussy and sued Contessa Marine Research in rem/in personam (Sep 1, 2023), CMR files a counterclaim against SYG alleging misappropriation of marine technology, breach of contract, and conversion. Moore & Company P.A. serves as counsel — the same firm that represented Saint Tony LLC in the Cobia case where ¶37 confirms SYG's legitimate Seakeeper work. CMR's counterclaim contradicts prior sworn filings and the verified facts of the original admiralty action. This is the origin of what is later shorthand-referenced as "CMR v. SYG" on the same docket where SYG was the original plaintiff.

Jonathan Kappack opens Land and Sea as an authorized Seakeeper dealer, receiving the "Best Newcomer of the Year" award in his first year of operation. This is Phase 4 of the documented Kappack pipeline: deploying as a direct Seakeeper competitor after acquiring SYG's proprietary methodology through employment and extracting value through litigation. Kappack now occupies the exact market position SYG had built — with knowledge gained while on SYG's payroll.

Paul Forsythe is deposed for 207 pages in Forsythe v. SYG (CACE 21-01549-03, Broward County Circuit Court). Under oath, Forsythe admits to five false sworn statements drafted by attorney Chris Kleppin. Key admissions: (1) EEOC "500 Employees" Perjury (p. 93): Falsely claimed SYG had 500+ employees when actual headcount was ~20. Kleppin drafted the false EEOC charge. (2) Attorney-Drafted Documents (p. 91): "My lawyer typed this up" — Kleppin prepared false statements Forsythe signed under oath. (3) Secret Recordings (pp. 111–113): Admitted to secretly recording conversations with former employer Fred Hoffman in Florida, a two-party consent state. (4) Serial Litigation Pattern (p. 193): Documented 4+ lawsuits, establishing a pattern of coordinated plaintiff conduct. This deposition is now locked as PREDICATE-GRADE evidence for cross-case impeachment and RICO predicate act documentation.

Paul Forsythe's sworn deposition (Nov 21, 2023) exposes attorney Chris Kleppin as the coordinating counsel behind a multi-plaintiff litigation scheme against SYG. Forsythe testified under oath that Kleppin drafted false EEOC charges and false sworn statements that Forsythe signed. Key testimony: "My lawyer typed this up" (Dep. p. 91) regarding the fabricated 500-employee EEOC charge. Kleppin also represented Jonathan Kappack in his employment lawsuit against SYG — the same Kappack who later opened a competing Seakeeper dealership. The deposition establishes Kleppin as the central node in an attorney-orchestrated enterprise litigation pattern: dual representation of coordinated plaintiffs, federal agency fraud, and documentary fabrication. This is now PREDICATE-GRADE evidence for cross-case analysis and bar referral documentation.

M/V Slow UR Roll II (2008 Everglades 350LX, HIN: RJDE005I708) deployed at FLIBS 2023, Slip B241, as SYG's Seakeeper/Humphree demonstration vessel. Establishes trade secret proprietary configuration value. Later subject of coordinated foreclosure action.

Saint Tony LLC settles Cobia warranty case (DE 50/58/59). Settlement involves release of SK35 Seakeeper units — the same units CMR later characterizes as "stolen" in CMR v. SYG. Moore & Company PA vanishes from CMR v. SYG shortly after (cannot sign filings knowing the contradiction).

Following SYG's failure to respond due to financial distress caused by the coordinated interference campaign, Judge Singhal enters default judgment on CMR's counterclaim in the same docket where SYG originally arrested M/V Octopussy (DE 287). Akerman LLP's quad-conflict (representing opposing parties in multiple cases simultaneously) is documented. Judgment is challenged as void for fraud on the court.

A Chapter 11 filing has been reported for BlueWater Reel Estate LLC, but the bankruptcy case number and filing date are not verified in the current public record. The claim must not be used to infer a causal connection between Harbour Towne Marina and the separate SYG Refit Center asset-conversion track.

Four Ivankovich-linked entities file Chapter 11 bankruptcy on the same day in the Florida Southern Bankruptcy Court: Ivankovich Family LLC (1:24-bk-15755), A&O Family LLC (1:24-bk-15762), A & O Family LLC (1:24-bk-15767), and Atlas P2 Managing Member LLC (1:24-bk-15770). All four are represented by Gary A. Goldstein. The bankruptcy petitions describe the debtors as "a string of related investment companies whose ownership interests are in dispute," allegedly founded by Dr. Anthony and Olga Ivankovich (the "Doctors") and managed by their son Steven Ivankovich. The filings were made during Steven's contentious divorce from Jeanette Ivankovich and were joined as necessary parties in the Illinois divorce proceeding. An adversary proceeding, Ivankovich Family LLC et al. v. Jeanette Ivankovich (24-01411-LMI), was later filed in the bankruptcy court to resolve ownership and recoupment disputes, with Judge Laurel M. Isicoff entering judgment on counts 1, 3, and 7 on January 30, 2026.

BlueWater Reel Estate LLC is reported to be pursuing eviction against SYG at Harbour Towne Marina, 850 NE 3rd St #208, Dania Beach. SYG is reported to remain in possession. This is distinct from the completed asset-conversion track at the SYG Refit Center, 3383 SW 11th Ave, Bay B, Fort Lauderdale. The Broward case number, current stage, and any stay implications require docket confirmation.

Seakeeper Inc. terminates SYG's dealer/installer relationship effective January 31, 2025 — coinciding precisely with the CMR judgment enforcement timeline. SYG's primary revenue stream eliminated. Trade secret DEMO vessel (M/V Slow UR Roll II) loses its commercial deployment context.

On the same day Seakeeper terminates SYG, Jonathan Kappack's Land and Sea dealership is the established Seakeeper-authorized service provider in the South Florida market. Kappack — a former SYG employee who sued SYG, received an unauthorized $30K EPLI settlement, and opened a competing dealership in 2023 — is now the natural beneficiary of SYG's terminated customer base. This completes the documented 5-phase Kappack pipeline: (1) Access (2019), (2) Extraction/Litigation (2020–2021), (3) Unauthorized Settlement (2022), (4) Competitive Deployment (2023), (5) Replacement (2025). The timing correlation between SYG termination and Kappack's established dealer status exceeds coincidence thresholds.

~$14.9M, 2024 Sunseeker 100 acquired by or for Ivankovich interests. Held via Yacht Daddy LLC (Cayman Islands), whose registered address matches CMR's Brickell address (1000 Brickell Ave Suite 715, Miami FL). This is the largest liquid asset in the Ivankovich ecosystem and is currently listed for sale via IYC/Mark Elliott. CRITICAL: time-sensitive — once sold, proceeds go offshore and become effectively unrecoverable. Seacoast has no direct lien on this hull.

A Harbour Towne eviction filing is reported in Broward County, but the case number and filing date have not been locked in the public timeline. The proceeding concerns Harbour Towne, not the separate Refit Center asset-conversion track. No causal conclusion is drawn until the docket is obtained.

Safe Harbor Marinas (SHM) imposes facility access restriction on SYG at Harbour Towne Marina — the same day the creditor campaign accelerates. James Rogers (SHM) coordinates with Steven Ivankovich on settlement of the Daniel Hayes $229K claim. The convergence is documented: bar complaints, SHM settlement, and SKR termination all accelerate simultaneously. SYG loses facility access and its primary revenue stream within 48 hours.

SYG files Emergency Motion to Stay eviction through Elliott Law, arguing void service due to Hunter LLC manager conflict. Tom Ackel is both BlueWater plaintiff and Hunter LLC manager — the entity that served process. The conflict creates a jurisdictional defect under Rule 1.540(b)(4). Court later denies the stay.

Vice Chancellor Zurn presides over contempt proceedings. 8 additional sworn contradiction entries documented (entries #11–18 in HelmLegal sworn contradiction index). Pattern of procedural irregularity documented across Illinois and Delaware proceedings simultaneously.

Seakeeper Training Team ([email protected]) sends Tampa Training invitation to SYG as an active dealer. Cost: $300 per technician. Classroom presentations, workshop practical work, and demonstrations. This invitation confirms SYG was treated as an authorized dealer 18 days before the claimed Jan 31, 2025 termination date.

Travis Moore emails Sirena customer Dan Libera scheduling SK9 commissioning, extended warranty, and tutorial. Meeting set for week of Feb 10, 2025 — 10 days AFTER the claimed Jan 31, 2025 end date. CC: travis@, Service@, Robert@, Brian@, Jeff@ starboardyacht.com — full SYG team involved. Seakeeper coordinator Mike Giles (Sirena Yachts, 954-707-7074) assigned.

Tom Cole ([email protected]) issues the Sirena SK9 commissioning certificate to SYG. Seakeeper directly participated in issuing a commissioning certificate to SYG after the claimed relationship end date. This is definitive evidence of an ongoing authorized relationship. Customer: Dan Libera ([email protected]), boat arrived from Turkey.

SYG technician attends Seakeeper Full-Service Hands-On Training at Tampa Training Center. Invoice 92223 ($300). Seakeeper INVITED SYG as an active dealer, then BILLED them — definitive ongoing authorized relationship 63 days after the claimed Jan 31, 2025 end date. Training included classroom presentations, workshop practical work, and demonstrations.

Jake Stratmann and Travis Moore handle SK26 warranty process. Seakeeper continues providing warranty support to SYG 10 months after the claimed termination date. The following day, SYG is actively selling the SK26 unit at FLIBS 2025 — with Seakeeper's knowledge and without objection.

Dometic announces its entry into the marine gyro-stabilizer market with the Dometic DG3, debuting at the 2025 Discover Boating Miami International Boat Show. Dometic markets the DG3 as fully electric (no hydraulics) with roughly 65% faster spin-up (~16 minutes vs. ~50) and ~40% lower power consumption than competing systems — directly targeting the reliability, power, and hydraulic limitations of incumbent gyros. Dometic Marine Segment President Eric Fetchko calls it Dometic’s entry into “an important new category.” This public arrival of a credible competitor sets the stage for SYG’s subsequent pivot.

Justice Sapna Jhangiani grants anti-suit injunction in Steven Ivankovich v KJM Marine LLC (CFI 068/2024). KJM Marine had commenced parallel proceedings in the Dubai Courts on Nov 20, 2024 — the DIFC court found this vexatious and oppressive, violating the exclusive jurisdiction clause in the JVA dated March 20, 2023. The JVA was for “premium leisure maritime vessels for global distribution manufactured in Dubai” via KJI Marina Boats Manufacturing LLC. Neirah issued 3 purchase orders (Oct 2023) for 20 “Arrow 320” luxury yachts. Costs: $144,684.78 on indemnity basis with 9% interest. RICO significance: Active international marine commerce while claiming SYG's refit work was fraudulent.

A denial of emergency relief and related appellate activity have been reported in the Harbour Towne matter. The docket entry, date, procedural stage, and any automatic-stay implications must be confirmed before this event is used in a filing or causal timeline. It is not linked here to the Refit Center asset-conversion record.

Charles Jacob Stratmann, founder and CEO of Starboard Yacht Group, publicly congratulates Dometic Marine on the launch of the Dometic DG3 marine gyro stabilizer via LinkedIn and proposes a collaboration integrating SYG’s Salty Marine Batteries sodium-ion technology (UL9540A-certified, zero fire risk) with Dometic’s systems. As a two-time 2021 Dealer of the Year for the Americas (Seakeeper and Humphree), SYG’s public alignment with Seakeeper’s direct gyro competitor marks a strategic move away from single-source dependence on Seakeeper. In SYG’s account, this public pivot — and the sharing of SYG’s market research — preceded an escalation of cease-and-desist letters and a pre-emptive Seakeeper filing in Delaware, reportedly one business day ahead of SYG’s own federal demand. (Characterizations of motive reflect SYG’s position and are not findings of fact.)

On April 21, 2025 — about ten weeks after the DG3’s public launch — Seakeeper Inc. files a patent-infringement complaint (with jury demand) against Dometic Corporation in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware, Seakeeper Inc. v. Dometic Corporation, No. 1:25-cv-00484-JCB (Judge John Campbell Barker), asserting U.S. Patent Nos. 7,546,782 and 8,117,930. Seakeeper immediately seeks emergency relief — a preliminary injunction (DE 8) and a TRO (DE 29) to block the DG3. After a hearing, the court DENIES Seakeeper’s TRO and preliminary-injunction motions (DE 87, July 7, 2025); Seakeeper moves for reconsideration (DE 98). Dometic moves to dismiss (DE 90), then answers and files its own counterclaims (DE 138, Dec 22, 2025). The case proceeds into active discovery on a trial track (Scheduling Order DE 141; discovery into 2027). Seakeeper’s corporate parent is disclosed as Madison Sport Corporation (Rule 7.1). The takeaway relevant to SYG: when a competitor enters its market, the incumbent responds with aggressive patent litigation — though here the court declined to block the DG3 at the injunction stage.

Heron Enterprises LLC (Hunt Family) files 6-count complaint against Charles J. Stratmann and SYG. Case No. 0:25-cv-61374-EA (S.D. Fla.). Allegations: breach of contract, conversion, and misappropriation related to the M/V Vivere yacht project. The complaint documents that Safe Harbor Marinas LLC (SHM) — Steven Ivankovich's marina operator — interfered with project completion by restricting facility access, blocking subcontractor coordination, and diverting project funds. Heron and SYG are co-affected parties of the same enterprise interference pattern.

Daniel Hayes files Negligence — Business Tort claim against SYG LLC in Broward County (CACE-25-012408). This is the underlying employment claim that triggered Scottsdale Indemnity EPLI coverage obligations. The claim arises from the same Safe Harbor Marinas facility where SHM restricted SYG's access. The filing creates the predicate event for the subsequent Scottsdale Indemnity creditor cascade — another enterprise-caused liability layer.

Heron serves 2 sets of interrogatories, 3 sets of RFPs, request for admissions, and deposition notices. SYG produces 47 discovery documents including smoking gun CMR-DE-000094 (Safe Harbor Marinas financial diversion), BSO SMS evidence of coordinated interference, and authenticated emails showing SHM/Ivankovich enterprise coordination. The discovery production confirms the shared-affected-party theory: Heron and SYG are both documented participants of the same facility-access-restriction pattern.

The available W1015 record identifies the SK35 as a Seakeeper 35 gyro stabilizer, not a vessel. BlueWater reportedly sold serial 221-0589 for $309,000 on November 13, 2025; the recorded converted-asset total is $1,302,128.34 when the SK26 and Genie telehandler are included. This event is tied to the SYG Refit Center, 3383 SW 11th Ave, Bay B, Fort Lauderdale—not Harbour Towne Marina, 850 NE 3rd St #208, Dania Beach. The BlueWater Chapter 11 case number and filing date remain unverified and are not stated as fact here.

Seacoast National Bank files admiralty complaint against Contessa Marine Research LLC and Anthony Ivankovich in personam (1:25-cv-25958-DPG, S.D. Fla., Judge Darrin P. Gayles). Cause: 28:1333 Admiralty. CMR address on complaint: 1000 Brickell Avenue, Suite 715, Miami, FL 33131. Plaintiff counsel: Robert Dewitt McIntosh & Adam B. Cooke (Fowler White Burnett, P.A.). Filing fees $405.00. Case transferred from 1:25-cv-25957. CRITICAL: The defendant CMR is the 2021 entity (FL Document L21000423951), not the original 2016 entity. Operating Agreement (08/26/2021) shows Steven Ivankovich was original sole member who "assigned" interest to Anthony — but Joe Seinitz (former GM) declares Anthony never acted as member and had no knowledge. This is the entity used for Cobia litigation and Seacoast financing. The case is later referred to magistrate and mediation (DE 16, Mar 2026).

PACER-VERIFIED: Akerman LLP holds four confirmed adverse representations against SYG/Stratmann across the same litigation cluster: (1) CMR/Ivankovich (0:23-cv-61696-AHS) via Rogers/Berger — Ivankovich plaintiff adverse to SYG; (2) SHM/LMC Safe Harbor Marinas via Blankenship/Cichowski — extracted $781K in duress settlement and billing from SYG; (3) Seacoast National Bank vessel foreclosure (0:26-cv-60289-WPD) via Amanda Klopp (FL Bar #124156) — adverse to SYG; (4) Ivankovich Family LLC bankruptcy (24-15755-LMI) via Berger — confirmed active, debtor's counsel. FRAUD ON THE COURT: Klopp's written conflict denial (Jan 26, 2026) while simultaneously representing Seacoast adverse to SYG — and while Berger actively represented IFB in the same bankruptcy cluster — constitutes a knowing false statement to the tribunal and a violation of FL Bar Rule 4-1.7. The conflict was reported in writing to Akerman Houston (Rogers, Jun 13, 2025) and to Receiver N.H. Levin (May 23, 2026). The conflict allegations have never been adjudicated by any court. CRITICAL DISTINCTION: In the separate Seacoast v. CMR/Anthony Ivankovich admiralty case (1:25-cv-25958-DPG, Judge Gayles), Seacoast is represented by Fowler White Burnett, P.A. (McIntosh & Cooke) — not Akerman. The confirmed Akerman conflict runs through the SYG vessel foreclosure (60289) + CMR (61696) + IFB bankruptcy (15755) tracks.

Amanda Klopp (Akerman LLP) sends first Seacoast Bank demand letter to SYG re: vessel loan default on December 18, 2025 — exactly one day after Seacoast filed 1:25-cv-25958-DPG against CMR/Anthony Ivankovich (Dec 17). At this moment, Akerman simultaneously has Berger active in the IFB bankruptcy (24-15755-LMI) representing Ivankovich Family LLC debtor, and Klopp now begins the SCB vessel foreclosure track adverse to SYG. The same law firm is simultaneously the debtor's counsel (IFB/Berger) and the foreclosing creditor's counsel (SCB/Klopp) — with SYG caught between both tracks. This establishes the operative timeline for the FL Bar Rule 4-1.7 conflict.

CORRECTED RECORD: Seacoast National Bank originates a $2,015,400.00 business loan and promissory note to Contessa Marine Research, LLC in August 2021, secured by a foreign ship mortgage registered in Jamaica on M/Y Octopussy. Anthony Ivankovich personally and unconditionally guarantees the debt. The loan is the foundational debt that drives Seacoast v. CMR (1:25-cv-25958-DPG). As of mid-November 2025, the outstanding principal is $1,549,773.47 plus accrued interest, per diem, and attorneys' fees. The mortgage collateral is M/Y Octopussy, not the Preston Bradley Center.

Amanda Klopp (Akerman LLP, FL Bar #124156) issues written denial of any conflict of interest to SYG on January 26, 2026. At the moment of the written denial, Akerman simultaneously represents: (1) CMR/Steven Ivankovich via Rogers/Berger (adverse to SYG); (2) Seacoast Bank via Klopp (adverse to SYG); (3) SHM/LMC via Blankenship/Cichowski (adverse to SYG — $781K extracted); (4) Ivankovich Family LLC bankruptcy 24-15755-LMI via Berger (confirmed active). FRAUD ON THE COURT: The written denial constitutes: (a) proof of awareness of the conflict allegation; (b) deliberate decision to continue adverse representation; (c) willful violation of FL Bar Rule 4-1.7; (d) false statement to opposing party and, when filed with the court, potentially to the tribunal. COURT ORDER VIOLATION: Klopp continued adverse representation after receiving written conflict notice (Rogers, Jun 13, 2025) and after the court was put on notice of the conflict. The conflict allegations have never been adjudicated by any court. Correction: ACAP 26-7791 is the Chamides bar complaint, not Klopp.

SYG sends written conflict notice to James E. Rogers (Akerman LLP, Houston) on June 13, 2025, documenting the concurrent adverse representations under FL Bar Rule 4-1.7. The notice identifies Akerman's representation of Ivankovich Family LLC (24-15755-LMI) while simultaneously representing SHM/LMC in federal litigation adverse to SYG (23-cv-61696). CC'd: Hutchinson, Valcourt, Cichowski, Levin. ORIGINAL PDF RECOVERED from OneDrive via MS Graph API (W1178) — Bates-stamped SYG-W1179-100001 (SHA-256: f122328b...). This notice establishes that Akerman had actual written notice of the conflict seven months before Klopp's Jan 26, 2026 written denial — making Klopp's denial a knowing false statement to the tribunal.

SYG makes $1,100 payment to Seacoast National Bank on December 2, 2025. Klopp confirms in Jan 7, 2026 email: "The payment made 12/2/2025 paid the 10/17/2025 Loan Bill and a partial bill pay of $99.92 toward the 11/17/2025 Loan Bill." This payment is central to the dispute over whether the loan was properly accelerated. Email evidence exported from Outlook via MS Graph API (W1178) — 10 .eml files with full MIME headers, Bates-stamped SYG-W1179-100002 through SYG-W1179-100011.

Amanda Klopp (Akerman) and Jake Stratmann exchange emails on January 7, 2026. Klopp produces loan history PDF and confirms Dec 2 payment application. Stratmann requests clarification on acceleration status given documented payments. Klopp states: "The loan remains accelerated per the acceleration notice." This email chain documents: (1) Klopp's knowledge of the payment dispute; (2) Seacoast's position that acceleration remains in effect; (3) the loan history showing multiple NSF reversals and ACH payments. EXPORTED from Outlook via MS Graph API (W1178) — 10 .eml files with full MIME headers, Bates-stamped SYG-W1179-100002 through SYG-W1179-100011.

Amanda Klopp (Akerman) sends reaffirming demand letter to SYG on January 9, 2026. The letter: (1) reaffirms the acceleration of the loan; (2) exercises the default rate of interest at 18.00% per annum; (3) states balance due as $144,342.18 ($143,054.75 principal + $1,287.43 interest); (4) demands immediate turnover of the vessel; (5) references prior Dec 18, 2025 demand letter. OCR text confirmed in `_archive/_seacoast_corr_text.txt`. Original PDF status: GAP — likely attached to DE 1 as Exhibit E or in Seacoast correspondence file. CEO to locate original PDF for Bates staging.

Jake Stratmann sends written response to Klopp's January 9 demand letter on January 18, 2026. The response: (1) corrects the record regarding the January 8 telephone conversation; (2) renews outstanding document requests (Promissory Note, Security Agreement, UCC filings, insurance requirements, payoff statement); (3) seeks clarification on basis for certain statements in Klopp's letter; (4) states that upon receipt of requested loan documentation, Stratmann will respond to collateral-related inquiries. Sent without waiver of rights. Attachment: "RESPONS TO KLIPP JAN 9 LETTER.pdf". Status: Extracted from .msg file in EVIDENCE_BATCH_W1028; needs Bates staging.

Civil Theft demand letter sent to BlueWater/Ackel regarding asset seizure at Harbour Towne. This is separate from the Seacoast/Klopp demand track — it targets the BlueWater eviction and asset seizure that occurred in connection with the Ivankovich enterprise. Full chain of custody: Bates BW-DEMAND-001, SHA-256 verified. Staged at `03_FILINGS_WIP\DEMAND_LETTER_DOWNLOADS\Starboard - ACkel Blue - Civil Theft Demand Letter.pdf`. This demand letter is part of the CJS-IVA federal enterprise litigation (0:26-cv-61150) where summons were issued to Tom Ackel, Akerman LLP, Ed Biggie, Black Ice Capital & BlueWater Reel Estate LLC.

Judge Laurel M. Isicoff enters Judgment on Counts 1, 3, and 7 of Amended Complaint (DE 174) and Order dismissing Count 5 and closing the adversary proceeding (DE 173) in Ivankovich Family LLC et al. v. Jeanette Ivankovich (24-01411-LMI). Akerman/Berger represented the Ivankovich family plaintiffs (IFB, A&O Family LLC, Atlas P2, Anthony, Olga Ivankovich) throughout. The judgment reduces Jeanette's recoupment options and affects the enterprise creditor dynamics. Independently, Court-appointed receiver Neal H. Levin (Rimon Law) has held authority over ALL Ivankovich assets since May 13, 2025 (Cook County 21-D-9220, Judge Boyd).

CMR fails to answer the Seacoast admiralty complaint by the Jan 9, 2026 deadline. Seacoast files MOTION for Clerk's Entry of Default (DE 6, Jan 13). The Clerk enters DEFAULT as to Contessa Marine Research LLC on January 14, 2026 (DE 7). At this point, CMR is unrepresented. The default pattern mirrors CMR v. SYG (DE 287) — but this time it is CMR itself that fails to respond to a federal complaint.

Three of the four Ivankovich-linked bankruptcy cases filed June 10, 2024 are closed: A&O Family LLC (1:24-bk-15762), A & O Family LLC (1:24-bk-15767), and Atlas P2 Managing Member LLC (1:24-bk-15770). Ivankovich Family LLC (1:24-bk-15755) remains active. The closed cases may contain discharge records, asset schedules, and creditor matrices relevant to the ongoing creditor race against the Ivankovich entity network.

Seacoast National Bank (represented by Robert Dewitt McIntosh & Adam B. Cooke of Fowler White Burnett, P.A.) files foreclosure action against M/V Slow UR Roll II — SYG's trade secret DEMO vessel. Filed exactly 62 days after Seakeeper termination. Case 0:26-cv-60289-WPD (S.D. Fla.). The Seacoast v. CMR case (1:25-cv-25958-DPG, Judge Darrin P. Gayles) confirms Seacoast is independently represented by Fowler White Burnett, P.A. — not conflicted counsel.

Akerman/Klopp deploys National Liquidators to locate and seize SYG's vessel (M/V Slow UR Roll II) on February 12, 2026 — exactly 11 days before the CMR bench trial begins (Feb 23). NL contacts EZ Marina (Moe), BSO responds. No court authorization at time of deployment — a Preferred Ship Mortgage vessel can only be arrested by U.S. Marshal under Supplemental Admiralty Rule C. SYG issues cease-and-desist same day. NL is later formally appointed court custodian at $1,080/day (DE 23, Feb 25). The timing — maximum CMR trial disruption — establishes the coordination pattern between the SCB foreclosure track and CMR litigation track, both running through Akerman. RICO Predicate Act PA-133.

On February 13, 2026, Akerman files the SCB vessel arrest motion (0:26-cv-60289-WPD) on the exact same business day that five CMR trial prep filings are entered (0:23-cv-61696-AHS DE 293-294). Single law firm, two hostile litigation tracks against SYG, same day. This establishes coordinated deployment of information and resources across matters — direct FL Bar 4-1.7 violation evidence and RICO enterprise conduct pattern. SYG LLC is separately served (DE 44) on March 17 — triggering a 21-day FRCP 12 response clock for an LLC that cannot appear pro se (Palazzo v. Gulf Oil, 764 F.2d 1381).

Tyler Atlas LLC (Ivankovich entity, Party #76) files suit against Gary Goldstein in Maryland Circuit Court (C-24-CV-26-001230) for $1.96M, filed February 17, 2026. Tyler Atlas had wired $1.2M to the Goldstein PA trust on December 15, 2025. Goldstein — a 30-year Ivankovich legal ally and PA trust fund manager — is now adverse. As an insider, Goldstein can testify to: the Ivankovich litigation pattern from 1996–present, enterprise financial structure and asset flows, trust fund usage and diversion, $12M+ disproportionate litigation spend, and Akerman's role as an enterprise coordination tool (corroborated by cooperating witness Tanya Ivankovich). This is a high-value witness turning point.

Brooke Linne' Bishop (Perry Maritime Law Group, P.A.) files NOTICE of Attorney Appearance for CMR (DE 8, Feb 11) and Unopposed MOTION to Set Aside Default AND for Extension of Time to Respond (DE 9). Judge Darrin P. Gayles enters PAPERLESS ORDER granting the motion: the Jan 14, 2026 Clerk's Default is VACATED. CMR must file answer on or before Feb 19, 2026. This is the corrected record: CMR did NOT remain in default — it obtained vacatur and is now actively defending.

Contessa Marine Research LLC files ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to the Seacoast admiralty complaint (DE 11), represented by Brooke Linne' Bishop. CMR is now actively defending after the default was vacated. The case proceeds on the merits. This directly contradicts the narrative that CMR "defaulted and collapsed" — the entity is litigating, with new counsel, and a trial date is set.

PILLAR EVENT — JUDICIAL ADMISSION UNDER OATH: At the CMR v. SYG bench trial (Judge Singhal, Feb 23, 2026), Steven Ivankovich testifies under oath on direct examination by Mr. Perry: “[Serial #35-212-0428] is essentially stolen… it’s sitting in a Fort Lauderdale warehouse” (Tr. 86:4–6). Ivankovich further admits he hired a private investigator to locate the unit. This is a sworn judicial admission from the plaintiff’s own witness that a Seakeeper SK35 gyro stabilizer (one of three SYG purchased for $576,084 through the Octopussy project) was stolen and known to be in a Fort Lauderdale warehouse on the day of trial. The statement directly contradicts Seakeeper’s own subpoenaed manufacturing records (Madison Industries D-82 / DE 314-3) showing serial #-0428 as “still installed on the boat” (resold to Tri Sea) — a unit cannot be simultaneously stolen-in-warehouse and still-installed-on-a-vessel. This admission is the linchpin connecting the Ivankovich enterprise testimony to the BlueWater asset-conversion track and the FLPD Grand Theft investigation (Report 34-2512-209096). Source: RICO DB timeline_events id=464, id=472, id=474. BSO source: DOCKET-BSO-000020.

Bench trial before Judge Singhal. Steven Ivankovich testifies under oath (direct by Mr. Perry, cross by Stratmann). VERIFIED CONTRADICTIONS from transcript pp. 84–86 and 93 (firsthand verified): (1) The "Stolen" Contradiction: Ivankovich swears unit #-0428 is "essentially stolen... sitting in a Fort Lauderdale warehouse" (Tr. 85:23–86:7). Manufacturer's subpoenaed records (Madison D-82 / DE 314-3) show #-0428 is "still installed on the boat" (resold to Tri Sea). A unit cannot be simultaneously stolen-in-warehouse and still-installed-on-boat. (2) The "Beggar vs. Forcer" Contradiction: Ivankovich swears CJS "essentially begged us for the business to get the Seakeepers" (Tr. 93:1–3; corroborated by Forsythe deposition p. 93, admitted perjury). DEALER OF THE YEAR 2021: SYG had already earned Seakeeper Dealer of the Year for the Americas in 2021 — and Humphree Dealer of the Year the same year, the only U.S. dealer to hold both concurrently. There was no need to "beg" for SK35 units in 2022 to achieve status already earned. This directly contradicts CMR's counterclaim theory that CJS forced the purchase. (3) The Return Count Contradiction: Ivankovich says "one of the units" was returned for credit. Madison D-82 shows TWO units returned: #-0433 ($170,004.20) + #-0432 ($192,068.00) = $362,072.20. (4) Dealer of the Year Timing: Ivankovich claims units bought to make CJS "dealer of the year" (Tr. 84:19–85:1). Award year = 2021; SK-35 purchases = 2022. Sequence does not support motive theory. RESULT: These sworn/subpoenaed contradictions are now locked as PREDICATE-GRADE impeachment exhibits. CEO wet-signature + counsel + filing preflight required before filing. (Source: transcript pp. 84–86, 93; verified verbatim 2026-06-08. Note: "serial numbers" and "stop work order" do NOT appear in transcript — confirmed.)

Scottsdale Indemnity Company (SYG's EPLI insurer under policy EKI3336603, effective since June 2020) files CACE-26-002670 against SYG LLC for contract and indebtedness. The insurer seeks unpaid deductible, premium, and reimbursement — turning a coverage relationship into an adversarial collection action. This is the enterprise-caused creditor cascade: Safe Harbor restriction → revenue destruction → inability to pay insurance premiums → insurer becomes creditor. Another layer of the coordinated interference pattern.

PILLAR PATTERN — ENTERPRISE LITIGATION PRESSURE: A limited liability company cannot appear pro se in federal court. Across four coordinated actions, plaintiffs affiliated with or benefiting the Ivankovich enterprise sued SYG, engineered or exploited the absence of counsel, then moved for default or default judgment: (1) Contessa Marine Research (CMR) — DE 299 final default judgment entered Feb 20, 2026 after SYG went months without counsel (Judge Singhal); (2) Heron Enterprises LLC — motion for sanctions + Clerk’s default (DE 310), Jan 28, 2026 counsel-or-default order (Judge Singhal); (3) Locality Bank — motion for default judgment DE 413, Jun 19, 2026 (Judge Singhal); and (4) Vivere Adventures Ltd. — garnishment of SYG’s Chase accounts after counsel Valcourt withdrew Nov 21, 2025 (Judge Dimitrouleas). Same vector; three of the four before the same judge. This is the litigation-pressure backbone underlying SYG’s Rule 60(b)(3) theory. Racketeering predicates under 18 U.S.C. § 1962 are logged in the RICO evidence database (Heron: 18; Ivankovich: 8).

Vivere Adventures, Ltd. files a complaint against Starboard Yacht Group LLC in the S.D. Fla. before Judge William P. Dimitrouleas (DE 1, May 29, 2025; later stricken/re-filed per DE 7). SYG’s counsel Matthew John Valcourt is granted leave to withdraw November 21, 2025, with a December 5, 2025 deadline for SYG to obtain new counsel — leaving the LLC unrepresented. Vivere then pursues writs of garnishment against SYG’s JPMorgan Chase accounts (Answer DE 357; writ returned executed as to Chase March 17, 2026), and SYG’s pro se reply and emergency motion to dissolve the garnishment are STRICKEN (DE 49 / DE 355, May 1, 2026). Same counsel-stripping → default/collection vector as the CMR and Locality actions.

Heron Enterprises, LLC files a complaint against SYG in the S.D. Fla., assigned to Judge Raag Singhal and Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss (DE 1, Jul 7, 2025). Heron moves for sanctions and for the Clerk to enter default against SYG (DE 310). The Court’s omnibus order (DE 30 / DE 311) gives SYG until Wednesday, January 28, 2026 to have counsel notice an appearance, “after which date, if no counsel has appeared, this litigation shall proceed” — the identical LLC-cannot-appear-pro-se default vector used against SYG in the CMR, Locality, and Vivere actions. 18 U.S.C. § 1962 racketeering predicates logged (18 entries).

Locality Bank files a complaint against Starboard Yacht Group LLC and Charles Jake Stratmann in the S.D. Fla. before Judge Raag Singhal and Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss (Jan 12, 2026). Locality moves for default judgment (DE 413, Jun 19, 2026, with affidavit of indebtedness and attorney-fee affidavit) while Stratmann, appearing pro se, opposes and moves to set aside default (DE 27; response DE 410; reply DE 409). This is the third S.D. Fla. creditor action against SYG before Judge Singhal following the identical default vector.

My Buddy Davis, LLC files a complaint against Starboard Yacht Group LLC in the S.D. Fla. (DE 1, Mar 14, 2022; Judge K. Michael Moore), including defamation-linked claims. This is the earliest docketed adversarial action against SYG in the RICO evidence set, logged under the enterprise pattern as obstruction / intimidation — establishing that the creditor-litigation pressure against SYG predates the Seakeeper and Octopussy pillars.

Federal marshal executes arrest warrant in rem (DE 33). Frank Kups of G Robert Toney and Associates appointed as custodian (DE 23). SYG's emergency preservation motion (DE 13) had been stricken February 18 (DE 15). Trade secret DEMO vessel now in federal custody.

Joint Scheduling Report filed by Seacoast (DE 15). Judge Darrin P. Gayles enters SCHEDULING ORDER: Jury Trial set for March 8, 2027 in Miami Division; Telephonic Calendar Call March 3, 2027; Telephonic Status Conference December 16, 2026. Case REFERRED to Mediation (deadline Dec 8, 2026) and to Magistrate Judge Detra Shaw-Wilder for Discovery Matters. The case is active and proceeding on the merits — directly contradicting any narrative that CMR "defaulted and collapsed."

Water leak event at Harbour Towne Marina Bay 106/108 — SYG's shop and office — suspected staged entry for theft. Evidence photos taken of baseline state. Two vessels compromised. All electronics confirmed missing by April 23. The pattern mirrors the BlueWater asset seizure: facility-based access used to strip SYG's operational infrastructure. Estimated loss: $184K+ in water damage plus electronics.

Default entered against both M/V Slow UR Roll II (DE 51) and Starboard Yacht Group LLC (DE 54). Vessel auction notice filed. This mirrors the CMR v. SYG default pattern — SYG unable to respond due to the financial distress caused by the coordinated interference campaign.

Seacoast files an Amended Verified Complaint in the vessel foreclosure action (0:26-cv-60289-WPD). The verified complaint replaces the original Feb 2, 2026 filing and narrows the foreclosure to the $168,773.21 judgment amount.

Court issues an Order to Show Cause in the vessel foreclosure action. This is the procedural step leading to the final judgment entered 16 days later.

Final judgment entered in the amount of $168,773.21. This is the judgment that drives the U.S. Marshal sale. The vessel was appraised at $1,000,000 — the judgment is only 16.9% of the appraisal, yet the vessel was sold for even less ($160,000 = 16% of appraisal). The disparity between judgment amount, appraisal, and sale price is central to the price suppression analysis.

Appellant reports the Akerman conflict to Receiver N.H. Levin. This is separate from the prior written conflict notice sent to James E. Rogers (Akerman, Houston) on Jun 13, 2025. The conflict allegations have never been adjudicated by any court.

Broward Sheriff's Office generates Stolen Property Inventory Report confirming $586,000+ in stolen electronics, tools, and marine equipment from Bay 106/108. The theft occurred between April 10–23, 2026. Microsoft Graph confirms all Bay 106 correspondence sent to law enforcement. The pattern is consistent with prior enterprise conduct: facility access used to strip SYG's operational capacity — first BlueWater (eviction/asset seizure), then Safe Harbor (facility restriction), now BSO theft.

Helm Legal launches secure portal at app.helmlegal.net with full 47-document discovery production for Heron v. Stratmann. Shared-affected-party theory documented: SYG and Heron are co-affected parties of the same Safe Harbor Marinas / Ivankovich enterprise interference. Creditor coalition coordination ongoing.

Anthony Ivankovich, named as a defendant and guarantor in pending Florida admiralty litigation (Seacoast National Bank v. Contessa Marine Research LLC & Anthony Ivankovich, 1:25-cv-25958-DPG), passes away in late May 2026. His passing raises succession and estate questions for matters in which he was a named party or guarantor. Under generally applicable probate and trust principles, guaranty obligations survive a party's death and pass to the estate, and administration of any estate or family trust transfers to the surviving fiduciary/successor under the governing instrument and applicable state law. No findings or allegations are implied; matters proceed under applicable law.

Seacoast has the strongest collection position of any creditor but is aimed at dead guarantors and empty shells through conflicted counsel. Ranked options: (1) Anthony's Estate on personal guaranty (strongest — survives death; reaches probate assets before distribution); (2) CMR Judgment (easy but judgment-proof — entity INACTIVE since 09/22/2022); (3) Fraudulent Transfer / Alter-Ego (the real money — only path to the Sunseeker; powered by Coleman $30.7M/30-day finding); (4) Admiralty (limited to Slow UR Roll II, not the Sunseeker); (5) Leverage Akerman Conflict + Mediation 7/14/2026 (convert adversary into aligned creditor).

Multiple creditors competing for the same limited Ivankovich assets: (a) CJS-RICO (0:26-cv-61150-PAB, $30.7M+ Coleman collateral estoppel); (b) Seacoast National Bank (admiralty + guaranty, mediation 7/14/2026); (c) 12Five ($15M judgment, settled); (d) Radiance Capital (securities fraud); (e) Anthony Ivankovich Estate (probate, competing claims). The Sunseeker ($14.9M) is the prize. Whoever pierces Yacht Daddy LLC (Cayman) / attaches the hull first wins. CJS/SYG edge = assembled evidence package to prove the pierce.

Joe Seinitz (former CMR GM) is a force-multiplier: knows the Yacht Daddy/Contessa structure, Steven's control mechanisms, and the asset-stripping playbook. Interests align (Joe is also a CMR-sued defendant). PROTOCOL: (1) NEVER contact Akerman — conflicted and adverse; (2) Route through Joe's counsel + cooperating-witness protocols first; (3) Package, don't converse — counsel-vetted written proffer to Seacoast's independent counsel; (4) Use Akerman conflict as ICEBREAKER to convert Seacoast from adversary into aligned creditor; (5) Propose joint fraudulent-transfer/alter-ego action to pierce Yacht Daddy before Sunseeker sells.

URGENT: M/Y Contessa (2024 Sunseeker 100, ~$14.9M) is listed for sale via IYC/Mark Elliott. Once the hull sells, proceeds go to Yacht Daddy LLC (Cayman) and become effectively unrecoverable. Seacoast has no direct lien, so its only path is fraudulent-transfer/alter-ego — which requires the evidence package CJS/SYG has assembled (Coleman + Seinitz + OA fraud + dual-entity). ACTION REQUIRED: deliver Seinitz proffer to Seacoast independent counsel before 7/14/2026 mediation; explore emergency TRO/prejudgment remedy to freeze sale proceeds.

Court-ordered mediation scheduled for July 14, 2026 in Seacoast v. CMR (1:25-cv-25958-DPG). This is the last structured opportunity to resolve before trial (set March 8, 2027). STRATEGIC WINDOW: If Joe Seinitz's proffer package is delivered to Seacoast's independent counsel before this date, Seacoast may convert from pursuing a dead guarantor's estate to joining a fraudulent-transfer action against Yacht Daddy / Steven Ivankovich — improving recovery from near-zero (estate) to potentially $14.9M (Sunseeker).

PILLAR EVENT — PRICE SUPPRESSION EVIDENCE: U.S. Marshal sells M/V Slow UR Roll II to William Wilson / QF Products LLC for $160,000 — 16% of the $1,000,000 appraisal (Paul R. Anstey, File No. 15256B, May 8, 2024). The final judgment was $168,773.21 (DE 70). The sale price is less than the judgment amount. No evidentiary hearing was held. No court has ever reached the merits of whether the sale was proper.

On the same day as the U.S. Marshal sale, an Exclusive Sales Agent Agreement is executed with National Liquidators (DE 86-1). The same-day marketing agreement suggests pre-arranged coordination for the vessel's resale — the buyer ($160K) immediately has a professional yacht brokerage ready to market the vessel at market value.

Notice of Appeal filed in district court. Appeal docketed in the 11th Circuit as No. 26-12270-G. The appeal challenges the foreclosure, sale, and confirmation — none of which received merits review.

Objection to Confirmation of Sale filed raising five grounds. The objection is filed within the 14-day post-sale objection period under Supplemental Admiralty Rule E(9).

DE 92 denied for jurisdictional grounds. The district court expressly states: “action is presently on appeal.” The court declined jurisdiction over the objection — then confirmed the sale 13 days later (DE 108, Jul 14). This is a key procedural contradiction: the court denied the objection for lack of jurisdiction while the appeal was pending, then exercised jurisdiction to confirm the sale.

Original emergency stay motion filed in the 11th Circuit Court of Appeals (Appeal No. 26-12270-G). FRCP 4(d) waiver requests sent to opposing counsel (Klopp/Yoss) on the same day.

Phone service interrupted during the critical post-sale objection and stay window. This compounds the communication impairment documented throughout the foreclosure proceedings.

The 14-day post-sale objection period under Supplemental Admiralty Rule E(9) expires. The objection (DE 92) was filed within this period but denied (DE 93).

Commercial electric service disconnected. Combined with the phone service interruption (Jul 6-7), the appellant’s ability to communicate and respond during the critical stay window was materially impaired.

PILLAR EVENT — DUE PROCESS VIOLATION: Order Confirming Judicial Sale entered (DE 108, proposed Jul 14, entered Jul 15). The sale was confirmed without an evidentiary hearing. No court has ever decided whether the sale was proper. The objection (DE 92) was denied for “lack of jurisdiction” (DE 93) on Jul 1 — yet the court confirmed the sale 14 days later. Every ruling was procedural, not substantive. The confirmation triggers the ministerial title transfer window (Jul 16-23): U.S. Marshal issues bill of sale — no notice, no hearing, irreversible.

Supplemental Emergency Stay Motion filed in the 11th Circuit, updating the original Jul 2 motion with the DE 108 confirmation (proposed Jul 14). Simultaneously, a parallel district court stay motion is filed as an FRAP 8(a)(1) backstop — if the 11th Circuit denies stay, the district court motion remains pending. Projected window if no stay: Jul 16-23 — U.S. Marshal issues bill of sale (ministerial act, no notice, no hearing, irreversible). Title transfers to William Wilson / QF Products LLC. Appeal becomes constitutionally moot.

Clerk’s Confirmation of Sale filed, following the judicial confirmation order (DE 108, proposed Jul 14, entered Jul 15). This is the ministerial confirmation that triggers the title transfer window.

A Stay entry is docketed in the vessel foreclosure action. This may relate to the emergency stay motion filed in the 11th Circuit (Entry 3, Jul 2) or the supplemental stay motion (Jul 14). The stay, if granted, would halt the ministerial title transfer and preserve the status quo pending appeal.

A Vacate entry is docketed in the vessel foreclosure action. This may signal a motion to vacate the sale confirmation (DE 108) or a court order vacating a prior ruling. The timing — one day after the confirmation was entered — is significant for the appeal strategy.

A Response in Opposition to Motion is filed in the vessel foreclosure action. This is the fourth docket entry in two days (Jul 15-16), indicating active litigation at the district court level despite the pending 11th Circuit appeal.

Every ruling Appellant received was procedural, not substantive: Wage lien struck for citation defects (DE 79, DE 84). Objection denied for lack of jurisdiction (DE 93). Sale confirmed without evidentiary hearing (DE 108). Clerk’s confirmation followed (DE 109). Stay and vacate entries docketed Jul 16 (DE 110, DE 111). Conflict allegations never adjudicated. The issues on appeal remain unadjudicated. The district court expressly declined jurisdiction (“action is presently on appeal”) and then confirmed the sale anyway. Win condition: “No court has ever decided whether the sale was wrong — and you are about to lose the ability to decide it at all.” A stay preserves the status quo. The Marshal holds $160,000 in proceeds. Wilson gets the vessel if the sale is upheld. Wilson gets his money back if the sale is set aside. The balance is not close.

Seakeeper Inc. (counsel: Faegre Drinker Biddle & Reath LLP, Anthony Jankoski) files Trademark Infringement complaint against Starboard Yacht Group LLC in the District of Maryland (Case 1:26-cv-01332-MJM, Judge Matthew J. Maddox). Cause: 15:1114 Lanham Act — Trademark Infringement. Jury demand by plaintiff. Corporate disclosure (DE 2): Seakeeper’s corporate parent is Madison Industries Holdings LLC. Complaint exhibits include: Feb 2025 Email (post-termination period), Jul 2025 C&D, Oct 2025 C&D, Oct 2025 SYG Response, Feb 2026 Termination + Mar 2026 C&D. Sealed cover pages (Exh. 1–2). PACER case ID: 603281. Preliminary Injunction entered May 11, 2026. This is the active Maryland proceeding referenced in the SKR notice banner at top of this site. Source: AutoHelm W1104 CourtListener pull.

In CJS v. Ivankovich et al. (0:26-cv-61150, S.D. Fla.), the Court issues summons on July 1, 2026 to: Tom Ackel (BlueWater principal), Akerman LLP, Ed Biggie, Black Ice Capital, and BlueWater Reel Estate LLC. This directly links the BlueWater/Ackel Harbour Towne asset-seizure track into the CJS-IVA federal enterprise litigation. The Court granted an extension of time to effectuate service (Order July 8, 2026). Service remains pending — deadline active. Source: CourtListener RECAP / AutoHelm W1104.

Seakeeper (Faegre Drinker) files Opposition to CJS’s Motion to Increase Injunction Bond (DE 56). Seakeeper argues the $1.00 bond is sufficient and seeks to strike Stratmann’s filings, citing alleged misstatements of law including references to non-existent cases. Seakeeper cites Powhatan Cnty. Sch. Bd. v. Skinger and Aziz v. United States for proposition that courts may strike pro se filings that cite nonexistent or irrelevant cases. Proposed order attached (DE 59-3) denying the motion. Served by FedEx Priority Overnight to SYG registered agent.

COMPLIANCE ALERT: Seakeeper (Faegre Drinker, Wurm) files Status Report documenting that most infringing content remains on SYG social media as of Jul 14, 2026 at 11:00 AM ET — 12 days after the Court’s Jul 2 order (DE 65) requiring removal. Status: Facebook (Figures A, B-1) — Still present. Instagram (Figures D, E, F, H, I) — Still present. Linktree (Figure C) — Still present. LinkedIn (Figures J, K, L, M) — Seakeeper logo remains in banner; Stratmann bio/experience/post still present. Yelp (Figures 1-4) — Still present. Removed: Instagram bio (B-2), LinkedIn “certified Seakeeper dealers” text (J). Served by FedEx + email to [email protected].

DIFC Court of First Instance holds hearing in Contessa Marine Research LLC v KJM Marine LLC (CFI 091/2024) before Justice Michael Black. This is the same CMR entity that sued SYG in S.D. Florida (0:23-cv-61696) and Seinitz & Stratmann in Delaware Chancery (2026-0495-MTZ). The hearing concerns the Dubai yacht manufacturing dispute under the JVA. Triangular litigation significance: CMR is simultaneously pursuing KJM Marine in Dubai while defending/enforcing judgments against SYG in Florida — demonstrating active international marine enterprise operations that contradict claims of financial distress and fraudulent refit work.